1996 Renault Spider Trophy
- Story Cars
.png/v1/fill/w_320,h_320/file.jpg)
- 2 hours ago
- 2 min read
The 1996 Renault Spider Trophy stands out as one of Renault Sport’s most distinctive and experimental racing machines of the 1990s. Originally designed as a lightweight, open-roof “sports car for the year 2000,” the Spider was built to deliver raw performance through simplicity—no roof, no frills, and a focus on pure driver engagement. The competition-spec Spider Trophy took this concept even further, forming the backbone of the one-make Renault Sport Spider Cup series across Europe. The example offered here comes directly from Renault’s heritage collection and features the rare and visually striking “Harlequin” livery, making it one of the most identifiable Spider Trophy cars ever produced.

Although incomplete, this car presents a compelling opportunity for collectors and builders. It is being sold without an engine or gearbox, but it includes a selection of various parts that offer a foundation for an accurate restoration. In its original configuration, the Renault Spider Trophy used a 2.0-liter 180bhp engine sourced from the Clio Williams—an engine known for its strong power delivery and motorsport pedigree. Reinstalling the correct drivetrain would return this chassis to its intended performance level and preserve its authenticity as a true Trophy model.

The lightweight aluminum chassis, race-prepared suspension, and minimalist cockpit made the Spider Trophy a sharp, responsive car built for one purpose: competitive circuit racing. Even in incomplete form, this example showcases the engineering philosophy that defined Renault Sport during the 1990s. With its rare livery and factory provenance, it offers far more historical value than a typical rolling chassis or project car. For anyone interested in period Renault racing machines or unique restoration projects, this Spider Trophy represents an uncommon chance to rebuild a factory-backed competition car with real heritage significance.





























Comments